Kim Kardashian’s brain scan shows ‘low activity’ and holes. I’m a brain expert and I have questions

Summary of the article

The article discusses Kim Kardashian’s brain scan, describing regions of low activity and the presence of holes in the brain image, and offers a critical perspective from a brain expert who questions the interpretation and conclusions drawn from such scans.

Key points

The piece emphasizes that brain imaging findings labeled as “holes” or regions of reduced activity can be misinterpreted without proper context, expert guidance, and methodological transparency.
The author, a brain expert, raises questions about what these imaging features actually signify for cognition, health, or behavior, cautioning against over-interpretation based on single images or sensational headlines.
The article highlights the importance of understanding that functional brain scans often reflect complex, dynamic processes and may be influenced by technical factors, scanning protocols, and participant state (e.g., rest vs. task conditions).

Quotes (verbatim in Markdown)

"Here's what these brain 'holes' and the scans that found them really mean."

“I’m a brain expert and I have questions.”

Context and interpretation notes

The discussion stresses that low activity reported in certain brain areas does not automatically equate to pathology or broader deficits.
It calls for rigorous methodology, replication, and cautious interpretation when presenting neuroimaging results to a general audience.
The piece serves as a reminder that brain scans are one piece of a larger puzzle in neuroscience and clinical assessment.

Author’s perspective

The author, a brain expert, critiques the sensational framing of neuroimaging results and urges readers to seek nuanced explanations rather than definitive conclusions based on a single study or image.

About citations and sources

The text references the original article and its claims while aiming to preserve the author’s critical stance and questions about interpretation.

Practical takeaways

Consumers should beware of drawing strong conclusions from isolated neuroimaging findings.
When evaluating brain imaging reports, consider methodological details, sample size, and whether claims are supported by broader evidence.
Skepticism about sensational headlines can help prevent misinterpretation of complex neuroscience data.

Author’s summary (120–200 characters)

A brain expert critiques sensational readings of Kim Kardashian’s scan, urging cautious interpretation and highlighting the need for context, methodology, and restrained conclusions.

The Conversation — 2025-12-03